Bill and I also talk about Richard Beigel's report on the not-too-bad state of theory funding. An important warning: Regular theory proposals will have a fall deadine, well before the deadlines over the previous few years.
Evan Golub set up a Flickr group for pictures from the conference and uploaded some he took from the business meeting. Feel free to upload your own pictures from the conference.
I really enjoyed the conference for several reasons. For the first time since 1995 I didn't attend the conference steering committee dinner or have any other major responsibilities. I did serve on the PC and hosted the first session, but pretty much I could just relax and enjoy this meeting. Also for the first time since Amherst in 2004 we had the conference by ourselves on an American college campus allowing a very relaxed atmosphere. I really had a chance to talk over some neat research problems and catch up with old friends including a very large presence of former Chicago students. No new theorems for me this week but plenty of neat problems to think about.
Now I go home, switch hats, and get ready for the upcoming Electronic Commerce Conference in Chicago.
See you all at next year's Complexity Conference in Paris!
thanks for the podcasts, they were very niceReplyDelete
For those of us who cannot listen to podcasts (yes, there are some of us --- if you must know, I am traveling the next 3 weeks with no easy way to listen), can you summarize the topic of the debate over special issues?ReplyDelete
Any mention from Beigel of when NSF proposal writers would be notified of the outcome? 36/90 sounds like a pretty precise number, so I guess in principle he knows the outcomes. It would be nice have this info passed along ASAP.ReplyDelete