In the second half of our podcast
(22:34, 20.6 MB), Bill and I talk about the debate over special issues
at the business meeting between Joachim van zur Gathen,
editor-in-chief of Computational
Complexity (a Springer journal that serves as the current home of
the conference's special issue) and László Babai,
editor-in-chief of Theory of
Computing (an open-access electronic journal). Watch this space
for the results of the vote taken after the debate.
Bill and I also
talk about Richard Beigel's report on the not-too-bad state of theory
funding.
An important warning: Regular theory proposals will have a fall
deadine, well before the deadlines over the previous few years.
Evan Golub set up a Flickr group for
pictures from the conference and uploaded some he took from the
business meeting. Feel free to upload your own pictures from the
conference.
I really enjoyed the conference for several reasons. For the first
time since 1995 I didn't attend the conference steering committee
dinner or have any other major responsibilities. I did serve on the PC
and hosted the first session, but pretty much I could just relax and
enjoy this meeting. Also for the first time since Amherst in 2004 we
had the conference by ourselves on an American college campus allowing a
very relaxed atmosphere. I really had a chance to talk over some neat
research problems and catch up with old friends including a very large
presence of former Chicago students. No new theorems for me this week
but plenty of neat problems to think about.
For those of us who cannot listen to podcasts (yes, there are some of us --- if you must know, I am traveling the next 3 weeks with no easy way to listen), can you summarize the topic of the debate over special issues?
Any mention from Beigel of when NSF proposal writers would be notified of the outcome? 36/90 sounds like a pretty precise number, so I guess in principle he knows the outcomes. It would be nice have this info passed along ASAP.