In the real academic world you rarely see two people collaborate almost exclusively over a long period of time. We all have certain people with whom we collaborate often because we have similar interests, complement each other's skills, or simply that we work well together. But having a single collaborator can lead to narrow research, using the other as a crutch and worrying that outsiders won't know which one is the stronger researcher. But most importantly we thrive on variety and having different collaborators keeps research exciting.
Computational Complexity and other fun stuff in math and computer science from Lance Fortnow and Bill Gasarch
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Numb3rs of Collaborators
Last week's episode of Numb3rs The
Mole had a mildly interesting academic side story. [Mild Spoiler
Warning] Charlie, the mathematician, discovered that his friend Larry,
the physicist, published a paper without asking Charlie to collaborate
on the math, which according to Charlie would make the paper go from
"very good" to "great". Larry later confessed to
Charlie's dad that he worried too much about relying so much on a
single collaborator, especially one so busy helping his brother at the
FBI. Eventually Larry and Charlie talked out their issues and agreed
to work together again.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Exception: Neil Robertson and Paul Seymour. They have had an amazingly long-lived and productive collaboration.
ReplyDeletePeter Shor