A New York Times article today describes many of the decisions and possible pitfalls of the various kinds of auctions Google might use. Also check out the Google SEC filing. One can learn quite a bit about auctions as well as the business of search engines from this rather informally written document. I have never had so much fun reading a prospectus.
My prediction: Great interest in Google will highly overvalue the stock whatever auction mechanism they will use. If you are interested in investing in Google, hold off until the price settles or you will suffer the dreaded "winner's curse."
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.ReplyDelete
Blogger.com has a new commenting feature which I am trying out. I deleted the previous comment as a test.ReplyDelete
I left the old commenting system in place for earlier posts.
Test post... but also to say I hear there's an economic theory that says the style of auction doesn't matter (in theory) at all: the price ends up being the same no matter what. (Macneil)ReplyDelete
The Revenue Equivalence Theorem for auctions requires, among other things, that the buyers have private independent valuations. The opposite is true in the Google auction, we have a common unknown valuation (future stock price of Google). In that case different auction mechanisms may yield different outcomes.ReplyDelete
Google's dutch auction is going to be interesting, you can find more information on some of the issues hereReplyDelete