On February 20th we got the news from the National Science Foundation Algorithms Foundations Team that long-time NSF program director Tracy Kimbrel, was leaving the NSF, and not by choice.
Along with many others in part-time status at NSF, my service has been terminated earlier than I intended or expected. It has been a great privilege and a great honor to serve the Algorithmic Foundations community over the last decade and a half. It's disappointing to have it end so abruptly. I will miss it and all of you.
Tracy is just one of many government employees losing their jobs but when you know someone it feels personal. Tracy has been a fixture at the NSF and often comes to theory conferences to talk about grant opportunities and the state of the NSF. In my yearly pre-covid pilgrimages to the foundation for panels, I always had great conversations with Tracy and watched him work, getting the information he needed from us to make the tough decisions of which projects to fund, always many more worthy than the available funding. The theory community loses with Tracy out of the NSF.
We did get some good news earlier this week with the NSF reinstating most of their probationary employees. And Trump did say near the end of his speech yesterday "we are going to conquer the vast frontiers of science" but apparently we'll do it with a much smaller NSF if Trump follows through with his plans.
Talking with some fellow academics at another university, they had almost given up. "What can we do?".
We can push back.
Start by doing nothing. Don't preemptively change your policies and your values. Too many universities and organization are abandoning DEI programs, changing their curriculum, freezing hiring of faculty and students, in anticipation of challenges to come. We may see a time that new policies will survive the courts and force us to change, but not yet.
While the democrats in congress seem powerless, many of the governors, including my own governor JB Pritzker, have fought back, mostly in the courts, and have stopped, for now, much of the damage to the NIH and NSF. The computing societies urge congress to protect our research funding, especially in a time when we need to compete technologically with China and other countries.
As individuals, we can take our own steps, participate in Stand Up for Science on Friday, reach out to our representatives at the national and state level, and just be part of the resistance. We can't let bullies dictate our future, we must control it for ourselves.
NIH grants now have a 15% overhead instead of around 50%. Some schools have now DECLINED NIH grants for this reason. Is that a good idea? I want to say that its a game through issue: If ALL schools do it then it would be effective, but some may defect. Unfortunately I'm not even sure that if ALL schools did it, it would do anything. Might NIH grants now go to industry instead of Universities? Side note- someone (it may have been Lance) pointed out that with only a 15% overhead, schools may be LOSING money when a professor gets a grant.
ReplyDeleteAs noted in another thread, industry overheads for things like DARPA grants are generally many times university overheads. They definitely aren't going to be interested in 15% overhead.
ReplyDeleteDo you know if Tracy was re-hired?
ReplyDeleteLance, thank you for this
ReplyDelete