I tried some random searching and Academic Search is missing many papers. But it does index some Elsevier papers, where Google never got the rights. But there is a back door in Google via ACM. For example, do a Google Scholar search on Occam's Razor, click on the Blumer et. al. paper and it will bring up the ACM Digital Library page that indexes the Information Processing Letters article. Click on the DOI bookmark and it will take you to Elsevier's page.
In short Microsoft has the much nicer interface but not yet the breadth of articles. If your sole goal is to download the paper, better to use Google.
A little less related to academics, you might want to check out Google's just released Calendar. Looks impressive.
This site has a really nice BibTex search:
ReplyDeletehttp://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/index.html
It has had BibTex for every paper for which I have searched that has been out at least a year.
Hmm, it appears to have just imported information from the ACM DL.
ReplyDeleteI like the ACM DL best, but when I have to I'll use Google.
>>No. Just... no.
ReplyDeleteThe product is in beta. :-)
Thank you, Jeff. I tried the beta also, and had a similar reaction. Since Lance said it had the better user interface, I began to wonder if somehow the link from Lance's blog entry was wrong.
ReplyDeleteI'll stick to Google Scholar for now...
BTW, is citeseer still being maintained? It always seems a little out of date, or slow in being updated, but I like it too...
Michael
MM