In the book Hail to the Chiefs about the presidents, when pointing to a race between two people who had no business being president (I think it was Franklin Pierce vs Winfield Scott) wrote something like That's the thing about elections, someone has to win.
Looking at the republicans running for the nomination I can (with the help of reading many of Nate Silver's Columns) tell you why, for each one, they can't win the nomination. Note that this is not a partisan thing. But again, someone has to win. Is it possible to have the statements
A1 can't win AND A2 can't win AND .... AND An can't win
and yet someone wins?
Here is a list of the candidates and why they can't win.
- Jeb Bush is what passes for a front runner nowadays. Has the money, does not have the party (very few endorsements), and not doing well in polls in Iowa or New Hampshire, the first two states. Possibly because he does not hate Obama enough. Its an interesting question of whether the party, the people, or the money pick the candidate. In the past its been the party and the money together, but that might be changing. CAN"T WIN: Viewed as too moderate by the people who go to Caucus's. Also some people may be put off by the family name. THOUGHT: If H CLINTON was not the likely Democratic candidate, thus making the family name thing a less of an issue in the general, I don't think he would have run at all. UPDATE- Dropped out after the South Carolina Primary.
- Marco Rubio. Running for president for the first time is hard. The republicans rarely nominate someone who hadn't run before (W in 2000, Ford in 1976 which is an out lier since he was prez). Perhaps the voters/party/money like someone they are familiar with OR perhaps first timers make mistakes. CAN"T WIN: Will make some mistake and some might think its not his turn since he's so young. Also, Senators have it rough since they sometimes vote for bills in funny ways, TRIVIA: The electoral college reps from state X cannot cast both the Prez and Veep vote for people both from state X. So you won't see a Bush-Rubio or Rubio-Bush ticket UPDATE- Dropped out in Mid March after losing his home state to Trump. Very odd in that various pundits pointed to him as being the hope to beat Trump even though he only won Minnesota and Puerto Rico. Looks like running for prez IS hard for first times- though Trump seems to be managing..
- Rick Perry. He lost in 2012 because either he was too soft on immigrants (he supported some sort of Dream Act) or because of his Whoops moment in a debate. Frankly I have sympathy on that one--- I also sometimes forget which cabinet positions I want to get rid of. He has tried to cure both of his problems by flip-flopping (or evolving) on immigration and by wearing glasses so at least he looks smart. CAN"T WIN: His past failure makes him not look that serious this time around, and he will likely have another WHOOPS moment. UPDATE: He dropped out in September. His speech saying he was dropping out was pretty good (I am not being sarcastic).
- Scott Walker. Like Rubio but might be in better shape because he's a governor. Still, people in his home state are beginning to turn on him, a bad sign. He may soon have the same problem that Gov Brownback of Kansas has--- you promise to cut taxes, close loopholes, and cut spending, and that might actually be a good idea if done right, but you cut taxes , don't close loopholes, cut spending in stupid places like education, run up a big debt, destroy your states economy, and ... get re-elected. CAN"T WIN: Having not run before Walker will say something stupid. And as a gov of a moderate state I suspect some moderate things he did may be a problem for hard core republican voters.Plus his states current problems may be an issue. UPDATE: He dropped out in September. See Note on Bobby Jindal.
- Ted Cruz. Which of these quotes did Ted Cruz really say and which did I hear in some satirical setting (as a fan of The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, John Oliver's show, The Capitol Steps, others, I lose track of where I heard what) (1) There was no ebola before Obamacare, or (2) Net neutrality is Obamacare for the internet. I'll answer at the end of the post. He is now using Obamacare himself. . CAN"T WIN: A niche candidate with a small but loyal set of supporters. Not enough CAVEAT: Might be running to get some points of view out there like Adlai Stevenson and Barry Goldwater, though they got all the way to the nomination which I doubt he can.
- Rand Paul. Interesting mathematically: an authenticity - electability trade off. Some people are attracted to his libertarianism, authenticity and consistency, but not enough to get him anywhere close to the nomination. So he changes some of his positions to be more mainstream but less libertarian, authentic, and consistent. Alas, those who trade their integrity for electability end up with neither. CAN"T WIN: His evolving views might lose him his base but not gain him any establishment cred. Also he has the chicken-egg problem in that even people who like him don't think he can win the general election. (Ted Cruz and others on this list may also have this problem.) ADDED IN FEB- DROPPED OUT AFTER IOWA CAUCUS.
- Mike Huckabee. Won't get much support beyond his Social Conservative base. His stance on Same Sex Marriage will hurt him outside of the social conservatives, especially in 2016 (as opposed to his last run in 2008). I'm surprised he's running- he got what he wanted from his last run, a show on FOX News. CAN"T WIN: Was a moderate on some economic and immigration issues (he may also `evolve' which won't work), a conservative on social issues, is just the wrong mix for current republican primary voters. Note that many candidates are trying to avoid the Same Sex Marriage question as they know that being opposed to it will hurt them in the general. Plus some don't want to be on the wrong side of history (or as the kids say WSOH) . Politics- sometimes you're forced to have a public opinion that you disagree with and know will make you be on the WSOH , but you're stuck with it. I think Huckabee is sincere in his opposition to same sex marriage but he must surely know he's on the WSOH. He's hoping for a win in Iowa like he had in 2008. I predict that if he doesn't get it he'll drop out. ADDED IN FEB- DROPPED OUT AFTER IOWA CAUCUS
- Ben Carson. I suspect he is actually running to be a FOX News commentator. At that he might succeed. CAN"T WIN: First timer, never ran for anything, he'll be a curiosity not a candidate. Which of the following did he say: (1) Obama is a sociopath (2) Obamacare is like slavery. This may even hurt him with the Republican hard core who want someone who can win. CAVEAT: is being African-American going to help or hurt? I doubt his campaign will get far enough to tell. The other candidates and the debate panelists (in the sanctioned debates) will treat him with kid gloves to avoid being called racist. UPDATE- saying absurd things about Obama seems to not hurt any candidate. ADDED LATER- he dropped out in early March, prob because of his poor showing on Super Tuesday.
- Carly Fiorina. She said that our founding fathers did not intend there to be a political class, what we now call politicians. They intended for ordinary people (like the president of HP), for the good of their community, to serve in office. She left out that the founding fathers also did not intend for women to be president. CAN"T WIN: First timer, never ran for anything. (correction added later: She ran for Senator of California . She got the nomination but lost to Incumbent Barbara Boxer.) CAVEAT: is being female going to help or hurt? I doubt her campaign will get far enough to tell. The other candidates and debate panelists (in the sanctioned debates) will treat her with kid gloves to avoid being called sexist. HER HOOK: She claims that as a women she can neutralize H Clinton' women-advantage in the general. Interesting that she is making an electability argument instead of a policy argument, given that she has no chance of being elected. ADDED LATER- Dropped out after the NH primary.
- Chris Christie. CAN"T WIN: Hated inside of New Jersey. Hated outside of New Jersey.ADDED LATER- Dropped out after the NH primary.
- Bobby Jindal. Once said the Republicans have to stop being the stupid party. Later said some stupid things about Muslims in America. CAN"T WIN: If he ran as the moderate sane voice who will rescue the party from itself, he might get some traction. If he runs as anything else he has too much competition. Also a first-time-runner which is hard. UPDATE- He dropped out in November. He was in double digits (not his percent- the number of people who wanted him to be Prez- his wife, one of his kids, the other is in the Cruz-Camp.) He tried to be BOTH Tea-party AND establishment which was foreshadowed by saying Reps shouldn't be the stupid party (an establishment thing to say) and being racists towards Muslims (a Tea-Party thing). Was not liked by either. Scott Walker may have had the same problem. Rubio may have the same problem.
- Lindsey Graham. CAN"T WIN: Has worked with democrats which should be a PRO but it's a CON. He's running to be the voice of more troops-on-the-ground in the mideast, not to win. Since Americans don't really want troops on the ground I doubt this will go anywhere; however, instead of troops the other candidates will show their machismo by deporting Muslims. UPDATE- He Dropped out.
- John Kasich. Gov of Ohio. CAN"T WIN: Not that well known. Democrats have nominated unknowns (B Clinton, B Obama) but republicans almost never do (W might count).
- Donald Trump (ADDED LATER). Some people say that corporate America controls this country. If we make Donald Trump Prez we're just cutting out the middle-man. Won't get the nomination--- over half of republicans say they would never vote for him--- but his running is a farewell gift to Jon Stewart.
- Rick Santorum (ADDED LATER). Against Birth Control? Really? Google him to find other reasons he can't win. Odd thing- usually the person who came in second the last time around has a pretty good shot at getting the nomination this time around, but the fact that he came in second last time may be a sign of how weak the field was last time. Is hoping for a win in Iowa like he had in 2012. I predict that if he doesn't do well in Iowa he'll drop out. UPDATE- DROPPED OUT AFTER THE IOWA CAUCUS.
- George Pataki (ADDED LATER) Would be at home in the democratic party. I want to see him challenge Hillary from the right. Oh, he's a republican? But he's pro-choice, pro-gay, anti-gun, and doesn't seem to hate Obama. UPDATE- DROPPED OUT.
- Rob Portman. (ADDED LATER) I saw him on a list of possible nominees. Not under `declared', not under `exploratory committee) (Chris Christe and Scott Walker are still exploring, which surprised me- I thought they already declared), but on a list of `No indication'. Not sure why he's on any list; however, as Rick Perry taught us last time (and this is not a joke) you need to start early.UPDATE- never got into the race.
- Jim Gillmore (ADDED LATER). Never made it into the adult debates nor even the kiddie table. Do not know why he is running since he does not have a chance and is not trying to push some sort of issue (that may be why Rand Paul is running- to promote a viewpoint) UPDATE: In the least important political story of the year, Jim Gillmore dropped out after the NH primary.
UPDATE IN FEB: After NH primary its down to 6. Maybe now they CAN all fit on a debate stage!
UPDATE IN FEB: After SC primary Jeb dropped so its down to 5. They can now all fit into a car!
UPDATE ON MAR 2. Ben Carson dropped out so its down to 4. Now they can have an intelligent debate.
UPDATE ON MAR 4. They spend some of the debate talking about the size of Donald Trump's... hands.
UPDATE ON MAR 16. Rubio Dropped out. Now its just Trump, Cruz, Kasich. They can all fit in
There may be more (Donald Trump anyone? ADDED LATER- When I first posted this mentioning Donald Trump was supposed to be a joke. But political satire and reality may have finally merged with a reality-TV star running for Prez). But my point is that it seems like nobody can win, yet someone has to. Do you know other examples where A OR B OR C has to be true, yet none of A,B,C look plausible?
I can phrase this another way:
novices can't win (e.g., Ben Carson) AND first timers can't win (e.g., Mario Rubio) AND too moderate can't win (e.g., perception of Jeb) AND unknowns can't win (e.g., John Kasich).
They all can't be right, but looking at it `first timers' is prob the weak link in my reasoning. I could replace it with `inexperienced politician'. Even so, sure looks like nobody can win.
Ted Cruz: Both of the quotes I attribute to him he really did say.
I don't know Ben Carson's original quote but he backtracked to Obama reminds you of a psychopath,
which is much better than saying Obama IS a psychopath . But he never said sociopath, so the quote I gave is NOT from Ben Carson.
On Obamacare he said its the worst thing to happen in America since slavery. But later
opposite-of-backtracking said it was in a way like slavery because it robs you of your ability to control your own life.
Is this in any way related to complexity?ReplyDelete
Related to Logic: Are there cases where you have A OR B OR C butDelete
A,B,C, all seem implausible, as is the case here.
So could be interesting when you teach logic in a discrete math course.
(Though the example above will likely become dated rather quickly), as part of when logic does or does not work in the real world.
reminds me in the difference between consistency and omega-consistency.Delete
...and besides, according to the pigeonhole principle they won't all fit in the same clown-car!ReplyDelete
> Do you know other examples where A OR B OR C has to be true, yet none of A,B,CReplyDelete
> look plausible?
If I flip 100 coins, there is no way I will get HTHTHT....HT. Actually, that remains true for any sequence of H and T. Yet if I flip 100 coins, surely I will get one of those sequences.
> Do you know other examples where A OR B OR C has to be true, yet none of A,B,CReplyDelete
> look plausible?
Reminds me the difference between possibility theory and probability theory.
If you pick something at random from a collection of a million things, every individual item is a "million to one shot" yet one will get picked.ReplyDelete
Vizzini would say this is inconceivable.ReplyDelete