tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post941216462939165478..comments2024-03-28T17:47:19.992-05:00Comments on Computational Complexity: CCC12- post 4 of 4- Misc Info.Lance Fortnowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06752030912874378610noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-66474792283030754612012-07-23T18:22:03.853-05:002012-07-23T18:22:03.853-05:00Toni Pitassi emailed me her slides so I posted the...Toni Pitassi emailed me her slides so I posted them on<br />the Day 2 of n post (where I discussed her talk).GASARCHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06134382469361359081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-27348849325780141002012-07-23T18:21:18.762-05:002012-07-23T18:21:18.762-05:00Harry and Anon 3:21- Thanks!
Any 4:54- You would ...Harry and Anon 3:21- Thanks!<br /><br />Any 4:54- You would have to ask Venkat, but here are my IMPRESSIONS from what he said (always dangerous but what-the-heck)<br /><br />a) I suspect that the (say) 5 papers just below the cutoff were pretty good<br />and the cutoff can be somewhat arbitrary. I wouldn't quite say there is a need to reject, just a need to have only X papers to fit into the timeslot.<br /><br />b) The junk papers were REALLY junk. I don't know if they got good feedback<br />but its hard to give feedback beyond `I do not know what you are claiming you proved' to some junk papers.GASARCHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06134382469361359081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-70308315942299617252012-07-23T16:54:08.653-05:002012-07-23T16:54:08.653-05:00Could more papers have been accepted based on qual...Could more papers have been accepted based on quality if there weren't a sense of a need to reject many papers?<br /><br />Were the "junk" papers just poorly written? Did the authors get good feedback?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-82258092724584612092012-07-23T15:21:23.270-05:002012-07-23T15:21:23.270-05:00The summaries are great. I find them very useful. ...The summaries are great. I find them very useful. Thanks for posting it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-45423903632759878842012-07-23T14:32:21.185-05:002012-07-23T14:32:21.185-05:00Thank you Bill for those 4 posts. At least I read ...Thank you Bill for those 4 posts. At least I read all of them, with quite an interest and you provided some food for thought.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09364120444779754928noreply@blogger.com