tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post8839146609031004864..comments2019-09-13T06:20:55.925-04:00Comments on Computational Complexity: Intelligent questions about the alleged P NE NP proofLance Fortnowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06752030912874378610noreply@blogger.comBlogger125125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-39217033246887085692010-09-06T17:41:54.254-04:002010-09-06T17:41:54.254-04:00It is not Kafuna but Kamouna. Why should Kamouna m...It is not Kafuna but Kamouna. Why should Kamouna move from a harder P vs NP problem to a relatively trivial Riemann Hypothesis problem?<br /><br />As suggested above, he should focus on meta or para mathematics.<br /><br />Also, it is a bit insulting to all the great mathematicians that you issue an Errata to correct the spelling of Riemann, when a far -- far more important mathematician's name is mis-spelled and an Errata is not even issued. Riemann is nothing in front of Kamouna.<br /><br />I could live if Riemann is spelled Riemman, but spelling Kamouna as Kafuna is the greatest insult the world would ever bear.<br /><br />On behalf of all the mathematician, I sincerely issue both an apology to Kamouna and also the following Errata.<br /><br />Errate: Kafuna -> Kamouna.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-18871676654416421732010-09-06T16:48:18.484-04:002010-09-06T16:48:18.484-04:00Errata: Riemman -> Riemann.Errata: Riemman -> Riemann.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-13170196688937965662010-09-06T16:44:50.667-04:002010-09-06T16:44:50.667-04:00As Rafee Kafuna solved P vs. NP problem years ago...As Rafee Kafuna solved P vs. NP problem <a href="http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2008062910436" rel="nofollow"> years ago </a> he should not lose momentum and focus on Riemman hypothesis as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-83329203008017686242010-09-05T20:29:33.885-04:002010-09-05T20:29:33.885-04:00almost two years later and much of the same
http:...almost two years later and much of the same<br /><br />http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2008/12/24/inducing-percussions-in-all-of-mathematics/#comment-1346Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-60972827523834853582010-09-05T14:08:53.728-04:002010-09-05T14:08:53.728-04:00Thanks a lot. I appreciate.Thanks a lot. I appreciate.Rafee Kamounahttp://kamouna.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-81653724681514445852010-09-05T12:53:45.027-04:002010-09-05T12:53:45.027-04:00Kamouna, this is the same anonymous. I think you s...Kamouna, this is the same anonymous. I think you should stop participating in this or such blogs, and spend your valuable time pursuing the meta mathematics implied by P and NP. Nobody will hear on this blog and I am worried about your time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-781939794529841222010-09-05T12:50:23.590-04:002010-09-05T12:50:23.590-04:00I have worked out a solution to the square root of...I have worked out a solution to the square root of -1. I submitted my work a few years ago and one of the anonymous reviewers has told me that it is correct and they are just waiting on the other reviewers before accepting my work. Once accepted, what will happen to mathematics as we know it?Anonymous Ph.D.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-6440612698288904952010-09-05T12:06:47.418-04:002010-09-05T12:06:47.418-04:00Thanks a lot for your advice. Obviously, I thought...Thanks a lot for your advice. Obviously, I thought about a new consistent frameworkd. But this is P vs. NP which is not only about mathematics but also about meta-mathematics rendering all future mathematical systems (like ZFC etc.) inconsistent. Maybe a paraconsistent framework is possible.<br /><br />Thanks a lot for your comment.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-51781884927193798342010-09-05T11:47:47.535-04:002010-09-05T11:47:47.535-04:00I see what is happening.Kamouna found some serious...I see what is happening.Kamouna found some serious inconsistencies in mathematics, which is not new, as has been found during ancient time or even one recent example KR-paradox Kamouna provided. People then must have fought such a discoverer. Eventually the truth is the truth and those serious lovers of mathematics listened and decided to frame mathematics in a formal way to avoid inconsistencies.<br /><br />This is exactly happening with Kamouna. Serious lovers of computational mathematics should reframe computational mathematics in order to avoid inconsistencies. Kamouna you are wasting your time here. Just continue the next step of your science. Fix all the problems you are raising. Find a framwork which is consistent. Go under hiding for a few more years until you have such a framework. Stop reading blogs etc, since the current mathematicians are working with inconsistent mathematician. You are a serious lover of mathematics, so your time is far more valuable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-2335536635723917422010-09-05T10:22:52.186-04:002010-09-05T10:22:52.186-04:00Thanks a lot. That's very nice of you.Thanks a lot. That's very nice of you.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-6591791154731984112010-09-05T10:10:43.729-04:002010-09-05T10:10:43.729-04:00You are disgrace to the university that gave you P...You are disgrace to the university that gave you PhD.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-88318702788014799602010-09-05T10:06:22.981-04:002010-09-05T10:06:22.981-04:00You are the one hiding your identity because you a...You are the one hiding your identity because you are ashamed ot if. You are the one who has no scientific talk, then ask about my Ph.D. If one presents a P vs NP solution to a journal, do they ask him about his Ph.D.???<br /><br />Instead of searching the net for my name, you would have read the papers and commented. If you have read my Ph.D. reports you would have realized who is Didier Dubois whom one of you want to send him an email. He receives 200 emails a day. He is the top authority of fuzzy logic in the whole world second only to Zadeh.<br /><br />Please who has science writes science, nothing else please. You have seen how much you make me stronger via your criticism.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-79933468636616598202010-09-05T09:53:58.164-04:002010-09-05T09:53:58.164-04:00He is not a hoax. He holds a PhD from
De Montfort ...He is not a hoax. He holds a PhD from<br />De Montfort University, Leicester, England. Here is the link: <br /><br />Rafee Ebrahim<br /><br />http://www.dmu.ac.uk/research/technology/uoa23_phd_completions.jsp<br /><br />He is not lying, he is a real person, somewhat misguided. Lots of harsh words have been said, but his papers do seem to be way off the standards. This De Montfort University takes a lot of students from Egypt. Business, I suppose.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-25294713655895742312010-09-05T09:48:26.735-04:002010-09-05T09:48:26.735-04:00You are really sick. Did I say Didier Dubois is my...You are really sick. Did I say Didier Dubois is my supervisor? I said he is my External Examiner becaue the question was who awarded you the PhD. So, the question was about the examiner and not the supervisor.<br /><br />Second, do you think this list of students is exclusive.<br /><br />Third, I put links to the official report on the www.irit.fr paper, have you read it?<br /><br />Another proof of who's a crackpot here, indeed.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-89059339873490819402010-09-05T09:42:07.706-04:002010-09-05T09:42:07.706-04:00It is pretty easy to check who this troll is. Didi...It is pretty easy to check who this troll is. Didier Dubois?<br />Here is his page, no mention of supervision of Rafee Kamouna<br /><br />http://www.irit.fr/~Didier.Dubois/<br /><br />Supervisions:<br /><br />Doctoral Students / Encadrements Doctoral<br /><br />Sébastien Destercke -> depuis Octobre 2005 (Coopération avec IRSN)<br /><br />Hazael Jones -> Thèse soutenue en Décembre 2007 (Coopération avec INRA + CEMAGREF, Montpellier)<br /><br />Jérome Fortin -> Thèse soutenue en Décembre 2006 (Coopération avec H. Fargier et Univ. Techn. Wroclaw, Pologne)<br /><br />Asma Brini -> Thèse soutenue en Décembre 2005 (Coopération avec M. Boughanem, SIG-IRIT)<br /><br />Cédric Baudrit -> Thèse soutenue en Octobre 2005 (coopération avec BRGM, IRSN, INERIS)<br /><br />Now if he really was supervisor of "Rafee Kamouna" it is really easy to check - isn't it. And if he was, than perhaps we can get to the bottom of this. In academia, real people are accountable.<br /><br />So, a simple e-mail to Didier Dubois will clarify if there is such a guy, in what capacity is this guy working, and why does he behave like a crackpot.<br /><br />But apparently, there is something fishy going on. The reason - this guy "Rafee Kamouna" is a hoax, as suspected.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-37373153888085175062010-09-05T09:22:23.419-04:002010-09-05T09:22:23.419-04:00"For instance, because of Mark Hauser from Ha..."For instance, because of Mark Hauser from Harvard, would you call any other US scientist with flawed results "another American cheat"?"<br /><br />Americans more likely have unlimited supply of trolls, vandals and other such creatures, of which "Rafee Kamouna" is a prime example. This is no Egyptian, this is AMERICAN home bread kid-vandal who tries to hoax the world (a lot of fun if you are a lonely teenage nerd with lots of free time and too few friends). If you look at his posts carefully, you will see that he does not care about "proof" - all he cares is how to engage more people in an empty discussion. This explains his illogical interaction with people. <br /><br />As for Indians, it is a public secret that in selecting grad school applications in cs there is discrimination against Indian applicants, based on past experience. They simply do not trust the recommendation letters, even though there are plenty of talented students there. This is really a shame, but is not surprising given the experience we have - and it is just affirmed with Deolalikar, Chaundari, Deepak Chopra an the like.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-57888053400058822892010-09-05T08:57:59.800-04:002010-09-05T08:57:59.800-04:00Many people are all downloading my papers without ...Many people are all downloading my papers without problems. You have a sick computer as yourself.<br /><br />I thought you are intelligent to know that I proved not only ZFC is inconsistent but also Peano's arithmetic.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-21605607514194907222010-09-05T08:57:15.784-04:002010-09-05T08:57:15.784-04:00@Anon Sep 5, 4:04am "So why is noone paying a...@Anon Sep 5, 4:04am "So why is noone paying attention? Is this another Indian cheat? Is his proof wrong? Does anyone know anything about this?"<br /><br />I am surprised that this paper is actually published in a journal. This paper is from IIT Indore, which is one of the new institutes created for political reasons. The faculty here compare in no way to the faculty at the original set of IITs. That aside, there's no need to use words such as "another Indian cheat". For instance, because of Mark Hauser from Harvard, would you call any other US scientist with flawed results "another American cheat"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-50386275880228686412010-09-05T08:47:36.662-04:002010-09-05T08:47:36.662-04:00This guy is a serious hoaxer. His "papers&quo...This guy is a serious hoaxer. His "papers" that he links to from his page are infected exe files. His "papers" that are on archive (there are two in 10 versions) change titles from version to version, and are worst trash you can find: there is a "quantum gravity theory" (has nothing to do with it in fact, its a joke), claims that ZFC is inconsistent, Continuum Hypothesis is inconsistent etc. <br />A look at these papers reveals not a somewhat misguided amateur, but a seriously deranged mental hospital outpatient. Please STOP feeding this troll. This is either someone seriously sick, or more likely some bored kid malicious imposter, a wikipedia vandal kind of type (his english is much better than that of a typical egyptian scientist, especially at a comparably low level of achievment). This is just disgusting - this is some deranged kid making fun of both archive and blogs!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-4950640101295686672010-09-05T08:46:05.263-04:002010-09-05T08:46:05.263-04:00Is the Ph.D. something so big for you. Does it mak...Is the Ph.D. something so big for you. Does it make any difference to the validity of my claims. Anyway, I shall answer your question: Didier Dubois is my External Examiner who awarded me Ph.D., look at what he wrote here:<br /><br />http://www.4shared.com/photo/g_MpK0Rd/France_1.html<br /><br />http://www.4shared.com/photo/o2ZfVBz2/France_2.htmlRafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-41647574807101963732010-09-05T08:31:11.565-04:002010-09-05T08:31:11.565-04:00Rafee Kamouna: Who gave you PhD??Rafee Kamouna: Who gave you PhD??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-14100968495229913062010-09-05T08:17:17.986-04:002010-09-05T08:17:17.986-04:00Anon 100: You haven't read my papers. You refe...Anon 100: You haven't read my papers. You refer to UTM which I never mentioned. Who taught you to comment without bothering reading???Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-52579830351067633492010-09-05T08:14:49.817-04:002010-09-05T08:14:49.817-04:00You really are an idiot. Anon 98 is the same perso...You really are an idiot. Anon 98 is the same person as Anon 97. Can't you see the comments have been broken. LolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-81402719834747681042010-09-05T08:09:42.811-04:002010-09-05T08:09:42.811-04:00Anon 98: I never mentioned the Universal Turing ma...Anon 98: I never mentioned the Universal Turing machine. Please read my papers then comment. My reply to Anon 97 clarifies everything to you.<br /><br />Thanks a lot for your informative remark.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-36938338565106184232010-09-05T08:05:52.816-04:002010-09-05T08:05:52.816-04:00Anon 97: Thanks a lot for your nice comment. I ref...Anon 97: Thanks a lot for your nice comment. I refer to a Turing machine in my papers here: http://kamouna.wordpress.com/. I never mentioned the Universal Turing machine. In your answer to what program the Turing machine is running, I defined my interesting decision problem. In the semantic paper:"The Kleene-Rosser Paradox implies P=NP iff P!=NP", the decision problem was to accept the input iff it is a paradox. So, the input is any lambda expression. The decision problem to decide whether it is in the Kleene-Rosser paradox form can be verified in polynomial time, so in NP. The results of my paper does not depend on it being in P. KR has a mormal form unlike an arbitrary lambda expression, so it is clearly in NP.<br /><br />In the second diagonalization paper there are two decision problems. Alice is deciding the set {kk_1,kk_2,kk_3,…} and Bob is deciding the set {Not kk_1, Not kk_2, Not kk_3,…}. I proved that there exists an encoding when Alice's language is accepted Bob's is rejected and vice versa. Thus, diagonalizing against itself. The encoding is simple:<br />e(kk_i)=\bar e(Not kk_i). So, Bob encodes his formulae via the binary complement of Alice's. Read the papers please and I'm ready for further clarifications to help me retract my 3-year old claims. I enjoyed your post.Rafee Kamounanoreply@blogger.com