tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post117003606508353806..comments2024-03-27T19:58:17.387-05:00Comments on Computational Complexity: Rating PapersLance Fortnowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06752030912874378610noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1170688769896097922007-02-05T09:19:00.000-06:002007-02-05T09:19:00.000-06:00I use "cited by" statistics from http://scholar.go...I use "cited by" statistics from <A HREF="http://scholar.google.com" REL="nofollow">http://scholar.google.com</A>. If the paper is cited more than 100 times it's a kind of evidence that something worth is inside.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1170090824151818612007-01-29T11:13:00.000-06:002007-01-29T11:13:00.000-06:00"The fact that the paper has a reviewis itself a p..."The fact that the paper has a review<BR/>is itself a positive comment''<BR/><BR/>Actually Math Reviews aims to<BR/>review EVERYTHING published in math<BR/>in any respectable journal,<BR/>and ANY book. And I think it aims<BR/>at just CONTENT- the point being<BR/>that someone who reads the review<BR/>can then decide if they want to read<BR/>the article or not. <BR/><BR/>Bill G.GASARCHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06134382469361359081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1170041463383985152007-01-28T21:31:00.000-06:002007-01-28T21:31:00.000-06:00Could some sort of recommender system for academic...<I>Could some sort of recommender system for academic papers help us find good papers to read?</I><BR/><BR/>You mean like a committee of 20 or so top notch researchers twice per year reading over 400 or so papers and choosing the ones they like best?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1170041372023727922007-01-28T21:29:00.000-06:002007-01-28T21:29:00.000-06:00The most important thing a reviewer should do is t...The most important thing a reviewer should do is to get rid of the hype that's unfortunately common in TCS papers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com