tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post6273080056557737991..comments2024-03-28T18:17:00.135-05:00Comments on Computational Complexity: A Tale of Three RankingsLance Fortnowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06752030912874378610noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-78144506355771003542018-02-08T19:27:20.077-06:002018-02-08T19:27:20.077-06:00In principle, yes; in practice, CSrankings was dev...In principle, yes; in practice, CSrankings was developed independently before I was aware of this other ranking. Great minds think alike! :)Emeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11385357464549894792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-29944800676363840582018-01-18T00:45:39.256-06:002018-01-18T00:45:39.256-06:00Note that csranking is just a generalization of Se...Note that csranking is just a generalization of Seddighin-Hajiaghayi ranking from theory to general cs (on which there were several discussions on this blog). See https://projects.csail.mit.edu/dnd/ranking/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-72479570321653260572017-11-18T17:40:13.351-06:002017-11-18T17:40:13.351-06:00Constructive suggestions for improvement from the ...Constructive suggestions for improvement from the community are most welcome.<br /><br />See https://github.com/emeryberger/CSrankings.<br />Emeryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11385357464549894792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-12038733318123843912017-11-18T10:48:11.848-06:002017-11-18T10:48:11.848-06:00Here is another interesting ranking!
http://www.da...Here is another interesting ranking!<br />http://www.dabi.temple.edu/~vucetic/CSranking/#/ Dragohttp://www.cs.yale.edu/~radevnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-756545827636720422017-11-16T12:01:33.841-06:002017-11-16T12:01:33.841-06:00Suppose you had to pick one ranking system to be &...Suppose you had to pick one ranking system to be "main." From your post it sounds to me that you would pick CS rankings.<br />I would pick CS rankings without reservations, even though I still think it should be improved (see the older post of mine for some suggestions https://emanueleviola.wordpress.com/2016/07/21/csrankings/).<br /><br />I think we all agree that beancounting isn't all that there is to it. But, there is in my opinion an even more general problem. A ranking is, by its own nature, a number. It looks a little strange to me that someone wants to produce a number without using numbers.<br /><br />I think my utopia in this respect is to have all the information out there and easily accessible, including papers, grant money, awards, etc. Then anyone is free to slice this information in any desired way, or to ignore it.Emanuelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03621752924625381965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-75176553199309748902017-11-16T08:25:01.184-06:002017-11-16T08:25:01.184-06:00There's another ranking of North American CS d...There's another ranking of North American CS departments, based on the outcome of faculty hiring: http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/1/e1400005 . The up side of this approach, and an advantage over any bibliographic approach like "CS Rankings", is that it relies on the more deliberative evaluations of hiring committees rather than the vagaries of the CS conference system.Commenterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01456069015467951629noreply@blogger.com