tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post113030713026332081..comments2024-03-28T18:17:00.135-05:00Comments on Computational Complexity: Page SixLance Fortnowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06752030912874378610noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130430815216066172005-10-27T11:33:00.000-05:002005-10-27T11:33:00.000-05:00HAHAHA. Beautiful!HAHAHA. Beautiful!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130360045533868192005-10-26T15:54:00.000-05:002005-10-26T15:54:00.000-05:00why is the title of the post Page six and not page...why is the title of the post Page six and not page 3. Is there any deep theory behind it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130356703063668762005-10-26T14:58:00.000-05:002005-10-26T14:58:00.000-05:00easier proofs ... my impression is that often alt...easier proofs ... my impression is that often alternative proofs are not so well appreciated: i mean it seems sometimes difficult to publish such results ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130345008432365552005-10-26T11:43:00.000-05:002005-10-26T11:43:00.000-05:00Yeah, nice posts, Rocco.Lance: Geoff Blum.Yeah, nice posts, Rocco.<BR/><BR/>Lance: Geoff Blum.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130338347006184312005-10-26T09:52:00.000-05:002005-10-26T09:52:00.000-05:00For Casonova's sake, we NEED an easierproof of the...For Casonova's sake, we NEED an easier<BR/>proof of the parallel repeition theorem!<BR/><BR/>bill gasarchGASARCHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06134382469361359081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130332763454546682005-10-26T08:19:00.000-05:002005-10-26T08:19:00.000-05:00Haa, it's too disappointing that none of these the...Haa, it's too disappointing that none of these theoreticians actually exist. I guess we're too normal, or at least hide the colorful side of our lives successfully enough, that our FOCS/STOC conferences are way too well-organized. Thank you Rocco for a fun-filled post, fictional as it may be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130312446130778452005-10-26T02:40:00.000-05:002005-10-26T02:40:00.000-05:00I guess it is quite right...lower bound on bad beh...I guess it is quite right...lower bound on bad behaviour (upper bound is on good behaviour) :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3722233.post-1130311232892060332005-10-26T02:20:00.000-05:002005-10-26T02:20:00.000-05:00Shouldn't "lower bound" be "upper bound"?Shouldn't "lower bound" be "upper bound"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com