For those with an interest in auction theory, the Google IPO auction
gives an interesting testbed for auction mechanism design. Instead of
having an investment bank set a fixed price for the IPO, instead
Google will auction off the shares.
A New York
Times article today describes many of the decisions and possible
pitfalls of the various kinds of auctions Google might use. Also check
out the Google SEC filing. One can learn quite a bit about auctions as
well as the business of search engines from this rather informally
written document. I have never had so much fun reading a prospectus.
My prediction: Great interest in Google will highly overvalue the
stock whatever auction mechanism they will use. If you are interested
in investing in Google, hold off until the price settles or you will
suffer the dreaded "winner's curse."
Blogger.com has a new commenting feature which I am trying out. I deleted the previous comment as a test. I left the old commenting system in place for earlier posts.
Test post... but also to say I hear there's an economic theory that says the style of auction doesn't matter (in theory) at all: the price ends up being the same no matter what. (Macneil)
The Revenue Equivalence Theorem for auctions requires, among other things, that the buyers have private independent valuations. The opposite is true in the Google auction, we have a common unknown valuation (future stock price of Google). In that case different auction mechanisms may yield different outcomes.